AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Clearview farms maintenance number1/11/2024 Subsequently, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement on February 14, 2016, in which Ms. In the DHR Final Investigation Report and Basis of Determination, dated October 13, 2015, the Regional Director summarized the respondent's position, including: "According to the respondent, the complainant was allowed to break her lease without penalty at her own request." The Report concluded that there was probable cause to support the allegations of the complaint and the matter was to proceed to the hearing stage. The notes also recited: "She said that she delivered a letter to the respondent stating that she wished to vacate the premises, and she was not charged a fee by respondent for breaking the lease." The notes of that meeting were lengthy and very detailed, mostly concerning issues of the service dogs. Wowkowych, Laurie Stone, Property Manager, and plaintiff's attorney, Andrew Dick. Significantly however, the "Event History with Comments" in the DHR file materials noted an email exchange on August 4, 2015: "Sent email to RP atty re: conciliation RP atty writes that RP offers to let CP out of her lease early." On September 30, 2015, a conference was held at DHR offices with Ms. Wowkowych filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights (DHR) alleging that the plaintiff unlawfully discriminated and retaliated against her because of her disabilities. Wowkowych further alleged that sometime in July 2015, the parties agreed that it was in everyone's best interest if the plaintiff permitted her to break the lease and vacate. Wowkowych concluded was discrimination that caused unhealthy stress, Ms. Wowkowych alleged harassment by plaintiff's employees, which included police involvement on three separate occasions. However, at some point the dogs became a point of contention. Wowkowych presented documentation to plaintiff of a disability and was permitted to keep two service dogs in the apartment. The defendants alleged that plaintiff's manager was aware of this temporary living arrangement but forced them to sign the lease anyway for its entire term. Wowkowych was the primary tenant, and that Lindsay and Bradley needed only temporary housing and stayed only a few weeks. The defendants alleged without contrary proof from plaintiff, that Ms. Plaintiff alleges that the pro se defendants (the mother, Jayne Wowkowych, her college student daughter, Lindsay Wowkowych, and her daughter's fiancée, Bradley Bargerstock), entered into a lease agreement with the plaintiff on or about Februto lease an apartment for 24 months beginning March 1, 2014. This lawsuit arises out of a landlord-tenant relationship gone awry. with exhibits A-I, affirmed to on Novemandĭefendants' verified response to both motions, with exhibits A-P, verified on March 13, 2017. Plaintiff's notice of motion in limine dated Novemand affirmation of Andrew J. with exhibits A-L, affirmed to on Septemaffidavit of Laurie Stone, with exhibits A-G, sworn to on Septemand affidavit of Michelle Fugle, with exhibit A, sworn to on Septemand Plaintiff's notice of motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR § 3212 and to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR § 3025, dated Septemaffirmation of Andrew J. Plaintiff-Appellant appeared by Andrew J. Jayne Wowkowych, LINDSAY WOWKOWYCH and BRADLEY BARGERSTOCK, Defendants. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |